The Boys in Red are Back – Blood Angels on Codex cover not 7th Edition Cover

Retraction: There were rumours on Naftka that Blood Angels were on the cover of the new Warhammer 40,000 rulebook. This will came as no surprise to many given they are also rumoured to be in the box set, however this did give credibility to the rumour about the box sets contents.

Blood Angels represent my personal favourite era of 40k. Although there’s nothing much Grim and dark about bright red space marines. Blood Angels were the main Studio army when I started playing in 1991. My own efforts to start a Blood Angels force have never really got far, but they are still one of my favourite armies to see in the pages of White Dwarf. I expect we are about to see a lot of that.

A few of my Blood Angels, more can be found in the Imperial Menu above.

Unfortunately again the rumour were false. Maybe this was the cover of the 40k box set rather than the book.

Ben

20140507-092446.jpg

This post is also the 400th on ChapterMasters. Thanks to all those regular readers who keep coming back and checking the site. I wouldn’t be doing this if it wasn’t for you.

How much will 40k 7th Edition cost?

We have real news from white dwarf. The 7th edition box of books will be retailing for €65 which should put it at £50, a £5 increase on 6th edition. The new mission cards are going to be €6.50\£5 and the new psychic cards are going to be €12/£10. An extrac of pages from the white dwarf preview and the a page from the new book have been posted here.

It also appears that battle brothers is now restricted to internal allegiances within chaos, imperial and Eldar forces e.g. Eldar allies with Dark Eldar is considered battle brothers, any other codex that is allied with Eldar is not counted as battle brothers.

http://darogscompany.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/7th-news-and-leaks.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+DarogsCompany+(Darog’s+Company)&m=1

20140513-233029.jpg

40k 7th edition news from Jervis Johnson himself.

The J man has spoken. Hear what Jervis has to say about the 7th edition of 40k on Games Workshop’s youtube channel below.

Note he said nothing about percentages!

And away from real news, the following rumours are also circulating on DakkaDakka, from the Overlords Podcast.

From a pretty reliable source  who claims to have seen a copy of the rulebook for a good few minutes.

40k 7th Edition Rumours

1. Consolidate in to combat is back 
2. If a psyker fails to cast a psychic power they can’t cast for the remainer of the game 
3. All units can score, but only those with Objective Secured can contest objectice held by other units with Objective Secured.
4. Unbound armies may not contest objectives 
5. The book has rules for Lords of war but does not contact Escalation 
6. Stronghold will also remain a separate book 
7. Vehicles are getting tougher. The Vehicle damage chart is changing again. 
8. There will be 3 books Art, Fluff and rules. The rules book is the same size a Codex Space Marines. Note nothing is said if this is 3 books, as previously rumoured, or if this is 3 separately available books. 
9. Moving through difficult terrain will just reduce your units move by 2 inches 
10. Wound allocation is changing – no details yet. 
11. D-weapons will be tonned down a little. Possible a new table or invulnerable saves being allowed but nothing concrete is mentioned.

There you have it. If true I’m fairly happy with these changes. Although 6th edition had the least holes in it. I think it was possible the most boring, certainly it was the one I played the least.

Ben

 

Will it be easier to organise a game of 40k 7th edition

Over the last few iterations of 40k it’s become more and more difficult to organise a game. This isn’t purely due to the changes in rules, but a combinations of rules, diversity and peoples’ ever growing armies.
I remember when a game of 40k meant getting out all 6 models I owned. Rolling some dice to work out what profiles and equipment they had, putting down my 5×3 grass board, (movement was only 4 inches in those days) along with some of my dad’s railway buildings and using books as hills. These days it involves booking somewhere to play or booking my family out of the house. Agreeing who’s turn it is to be space marines. We only had space marines back in the days before Tyranid attack and 40k box sets. Packing up over 100 models and some tanks into a case, agreeing which missions/expansions we will be playing, if forge world rules, super heavies, fortifications, D-weapons or flyers are to be excluded, what points value is being played and if it’s going to be a balanced game. And all that’s before thinking about your army list phew.
As you may be able to tell, I like to turn up, put my painted models on the board and play game. Life is too short to spend more time planning a game than playing it. The problem with this is after 20 something years collecting Ultramarines it’s not going to be a fair fight if I bring all my models and the game probably won’t get finished either.

Will 40k 7th edition make planning a game any easier? Not Likely! Even if super heavies are in the core rules I don’t see tournaments or local game groups allowing these without question. Even though most armies now have a way to deal with flyers my own gaming group still views flyers as something that has to be authorised before being used. I don’t see D-weapons being given an open blessing either. D-weapons will need to be toned down in order to be used in standard games of 40k, I think D-weapons need to be toned down full stop, or have their points values adjusted given the changes made in 6th edition. My hope is the core rules version of d weapons won’t be as over powered is they are right now and this will stop the questioning over their use.
If the rumours on Allies sliders are true army list writing is about to get far more complex as you will have the option of taking 3 allied lists and picking which one your going to use once you have seen your opponents list.

So do you think 7th edition will result in simplified rules, less expansions and smaller armies??? Or much like Bruce Banner will 40k become a every bigger greener angry monster of a game.